It's been exactly ten years since the Solyndra solar
power company accepted a loan of half a billion taxpayer dollars that
would never be repaid. Now one industry expert says he's not sure any
lessons have been learned in the years since.
On March 20, 2009, then-Secretary of Energy Steven
Chu announced Solyndra would be the recipient of a $535 million loan
from his department under the Obama administration's revamped loan
guarantee program. Solyndra used the money, along with
hundreds-of-millions more from private investors, to build a new
facility where it would be mass-producing its easy-to-install
cylindrical solar "panels." The whole thing lasted about two years.
President Obama lifts a solar panel as he tours a Solyndra
facility in Fremont, Calif. (Reuters)
The ill-fated energy company had initially asked President George Bush
for cash under the loan guarantee program, which was created to help
companies working with clean energy technologies that might be
considered too risky for private investors.
But it wasn't until President Obama launched his sweeping stimulus
spending plan that Solyndra's application was approved, launching the
California company to poster-child status despite what were apparently
growing concerns about its long-term (and even short-term)
viability.
Those concerns were reportedly being relayed to the White House in the
run-up to President Obama's highly publicized visit to Solyndra
headquarters, which was scheduled just six months before the 2010
midterm elections. Congressional investigators later uncovered
information indicating that Solyndra was planning on laying off some of
its employees ahead of the midterms, but waited due to pressure from the
White House.
By the end of August 2011, little more than a year after hosting a
presidential visit, Solyndra had filed for bankruptcy. And the writing
was on the wall much earlier.
In Feburary 2011, the Department of Energy had restructured its loan
and included terms that guaranteed private investors would be repaid
before the government in the event the company went under.
Adding to the anger among Republicans over what was perceived as a
politically-charged loan process was the fact that one of the private
investors backing Solyndra was a well-known Obama fundraising bundler,
George Kaiser.
"[T]he actions of certain Solyndra officials were,
at best, reckless and irresponsible or, at worst, an orchestrated
effort to knowingly and intentionally deceive and mislead the
Department."
— Inspector General report on Solyndra, 2015
A little more than a week after the company announced it was going
bankrupt, the FBI conducted a surprise raid and agents were seen
carrying crates upon crates from Solyndra HQ in Fremont, Calif.
A 2015
Inspector General report found that Solyndra had over-inflated the
value of some of its contracts, with some clients apparently receiving
goods at a discount despite indications they would be paying full price.
Some of the clients they had been counting on wound up bailing due to
the availability of much cheaper technologies from China.
Either way, the IG report indicates that "the investigative record
suggests that the actions of certain Solyndra officials were, at best,
reckless and irresponsible or, at worst, an orchestrated effort to
knowingly and intentionally deceive and mislead the Department." The IG
admits that there were signs the government might have missed some
obvious red flags, while critics have argued those red flags were
more likely overlooked intentionally.
Sept. 8, 2011: FBI agents stand guard outside of Solyndra
headquarters in Fremont, Calif. (AP)
The loan guarantee program that helped Solyndra get off the ground,
however briefly, still exists today, and taxpayer dollars are still
being shelled out to energy companies of all types. The solar industry
itself also doesn't seem to have suffered much, with a recent industry report
predicting the number of installed solar projects would more than
double by 2021.
Tom Pyle, an energy industry expert who led the Trump presidential
transition team on energy, says the program's ongoing existence despite
the lessons learned from the Solyndra debacle shows that government has
no business backing private energy companies, whether they're solar or
not.
Solyndra CEO Brian Harrison. left, and Chief Financial Officer
Bill Stover, right, testified to House lawmakers in September 2011.
Attorneys Walter Brown is at left, and Jan. Nielsen Little is at
right in this photo. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
"Even though President Trump has submitted very responsible budgets,
including eliminating the loan program, Congress continues to fund it...
even more generously," Pyle tells Fox News.
And when he considers the prospects of our energy future under
proposals like the Green New Deal, Pyle says the lack of knowledge
becomes all the more obvious.
"The bottom line is the Green New Dealers want to impose massive
government control of our energy resources, and infuse billions of our
taxpayer dollars into doubling down on the Solyndras and those
projects," Pyle says. "So there aren't lessons being learned here,
they're going the opposite way."
Solar Trust
Belly-Up: Yet Another Obama Green Energy Company Goes Bankrupt After
Receiving $2.1 Billion Government Loan Guarantees
Obama Throws Another $2.1 Billion Thrown Down The Toilet!
Yet another one of Obama’s pet Green Energy companies (Solar Trust) has
gone belly-up, and filed for bankruptcy, less than a year after
receiving $2.1 billion in government-backed loan guarantees! In reality,
that means that an already failing company was handed $2.1 billion in
free money, with no plan or hope by the Obama administration of getting
re-paid, other than now having a group of people who owe Obama big time!
When will the American People stand up and say “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! WE
WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO WASTE ANY MORE OF OUR
HARD-EARNED MONEY ON THESE GREEN ENERGY …
...Continue Reading Solar Trust Belly-Up: Yet Another Obama
Green Energy Company Goes Bankrupt After Receiving $2.1 Billion
Government Loan Guarantees
The Obama administration’s Energy Department has just approved two more
government-backed loan guarantees, worth more than $1 billion, for two
more solar energy companies, similar to the loan they gave Solyndra.
Soon, we will also be learning about what friends and supporters of
Obama’s are involved with the companies, and how much the companies have
donated to Obama.
"As the Secretary of Energy, the final decisions on Solyndra were mine,
and I made them with the best interest of the taxpayer in mind," Chu
claimed in his opening statement. "I want to be clear: Over the course of
Solyndra's loan guarantee, I did not make any decision based on political
considerations."
If political considerations were not involved, then explain the Oct. 30,
2010, email in which advisers to Solyndra's primary investor, Argonaut
Equity, said the Energy Department had strongly urged the company to put off
an announcement of looming layoffs until Nov. 3, the day after the midterm
elections in which President Obama's failed stimulus was a hot issue.In point of fact, newly disclosed emails show Democratic fundraiser and
Solyndra investor George Kaiser talked directly with White House officials
about the now-bankrupt solar company's $535 million loan guarantee from
the Department of Energy.
Kaiser, a major Obama bundler and backer who raised $50,000 to $100,000 for
the president's election campaign, was one of Solyndra's primary investors.
Kaiser himself donated $53,500 to Obama's 2008 election campaign, split
between the DSCC and Obama for America.In a March 5 email, Kaiser wrote to Solyndra board member Steve Mitchell:
"BTW, a couple of weeks ago, when Ken and I were visiting with a group of
Administration folks in DC who are in charge of the stimulus process
(White House, not DOE) and Solyndra came up, every one of them responded
simultaneously about their thorough knowledge of the Solyndra story,
suggesting it was one of their prime poster children."
"Ken" is Ken Levit, executive director of the Kaiser Family Foundation, who
wrote the following in an email to Mitchell on Feb. 27, 2010: "They about
had an orgasm in Biden's office when we mentioned Solyndra."If Chu was keeping the taxpayer in mind, why was the loan restructured so
Solyndra's private investors were moved to the front of the line and
taxpayers were put on the hook for at least the first $75 million if the
company should default? This arrangement, subordinating taxpayers to
private investors, is an "apparent violation of the law," according to
Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee.
Chu told the committee that restructuring "improved the chance of recovering
taxpayer money by giving the company a fighting chance at success, with a
completed plant as collateral." The decision also meant continued employment
for the company's approximately 1,100 workers, he said.Yet when asked how much money taxpayers might get back, Chu said: "Well,
that remains to be seen. I'm anticipating not very much." The 1,100
Solyndra workers Chu said he was trying to keep have lost their jobs
anyway.
According to Chu, the "Solyndra transaction went through more than two years
of rigorous technical, financial and legal due diligence," a statement that
ignores the warnings from accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers that
Solyndra and its business model were not viable.Due diligence? Emails showed White House officials repeatedly asking the
Office of Management and Budget on the loan review's progress. One email
from a budget official referred to "the time pressure we are under to sign
off on Solyndra" and referred to "a situation of having to do rushed
approvals." They were under pressure to approve the loan so Vice President
Biden could make the grand photo-op announcement.
"This deal is NOT ready for prime time," one budget analyst wrote in a March
10, 2009, email. Another message — dated Aug. 31, 2009, written by an OMB
staffer and sent to Terrell P. McSweeney, Biden's domestic policy adviser —
concluded, "We would prefer to have sufficient time to do our due diligence
reviews." In fact, they were not done prior to President Obama's visit to
the beleaguered firm.There was no due diligence done in the awarding of taxpayer dollars to a
firm everybody knew had an unsustainable business model in an industry
largely kept afloat by taxpayer subsidies. Political considerations and
donor cash had everything to do with the loan.