THE FEDERAL VICTIM RESOURCE CENTER

State and Federal Staff, and Their Campaign Financiers, Have Been Attacking U.S. Resident Taxpayers As Revenge, Retribution and Vendetta. Our Alliance of Task Forces Is Making Things Right

By: Seeking Felony Arrests, Helping To Sue The Attackers, Exposing The Finances Of The Attackers, Demanding Law Enforcement Indictments, Networking The Press, Supporting New News Outlets, Pre-

building FBI-Class Case Files and Making Certain Every Voter Knows About These Abuses Of Public Office! - - Read and use the FIGHT BACK tips on this site to help combat this kind of corruption.

Home

Submit Tips

Evidence #1

Evidence #2

Attack Tactics

Corruption

Department of Energy

Dianne Feinstein Corruption

Eric Holder

Government Office Used For Vendettas

IG

James H. Baker

Kamala Harris Corruption

Nancy Pelosi Corruption

National Security Council

Steven Chu

Steven Chu Corruption

Uranium One

Uranium1

The Pentagon is seen from the air over Washington, DC on August 25, 2013. The 6.5 million sq ft (600,000 sq meter) building serves as the headquarters of the US Department of Defense and was built from

1941 to 1943. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images.

Inspector Generals Open Probes Into Alleged Retaliation By Obama Executives

The Pentagon’s Inspector General has launched a preliminary investigation into charges of vendettas and reprisals against whistle-blowers. Charges include those that James H. Baker, the director of the

Defense Department’s Office of Net Assessment (ONA), is retaliating against whistleblowers who warned of “rigged” contracts to outside consultants. CIA, DOE, DOT and many other Agency Inspector

Baker is an Obama holdover appointed by Secretary Ashton Carter in May 2015, who remains the ONA director 11 months into the Trump administration. Lovinger specifically protested $11.2 million in

ONA contracts awarded over a decade to the Long Term Strategic Group (LTSG), a company owned by Jacqueline Newmyer, a childhood friend of Chelsea Clinton. Clinton and Newmyer first met each other

while attending Sidwell Friends School, an exclusive private Quaker school in the nation’s capital. They were in each other’s weddings, and in 2011 Chelsea referred to Newmyer as her “best friend.”

Lovinger’s attorney, Sean M. Bigley, accuses Baker of continuing the LTSG contract in the hopes it could help him in a Clinton presidency. (RELATED: Chelsea’s ‘Best Friend’ Wins $11 MIL in Defense

Contracts With No Clearance)

“We submit that Baker’s interest was his awareness of the LTSG-Clinton connection; his presumptive desire to exploit that to his advantage in the event of a Clinton election win; and the fact that contractors

like LTSG served as a lucrative landing pad for ONA retirees,” Bigley charged in a Sept. 13 letter to Rear Admiral Kevin Sweeney, the chief of staff for Defense Secretary James Mattis.

The IG’s decision to launch a preliminary investigation occurred as former high-profile national security officials are beginning to publicly weigh in about Baker’s allegedly retaliatory actions.

Richard Perle, Ronald Reagan’s former Assistant Secretary of Defense, said of Lovinger, “He’s been treated so badly. It’s a disgrace.”

Perle called Baker, “a shallow and manipulative character that should have gone with the change in administration.”

But Baker poorly rated Lovinger in 2017, after he raised issues about the ONA’s reliance on outside contractors, including LTSG.

ONA is a highly-classified think tank housed within the office of the Secretary of Defense. It conducts sensitive strategic research, especially for the Defense Secretary, and the office is supposed to serve as a

model of performance. For 42 years, ONA was led solely by one director, Andrew Marshall, who Lovinger alleges initially authorized many of the sweetheart deals with outside contractors. Marshall retired

from ONA at the age of 93. Baker took the helm four months later.

IG Fine’s investigation into possible wrongdoing by Baker is being carried out by his “Investigations of Senior Officials Directorate.” That unit investigates “allegations of misconduct against the most senior

DoD officers (three-star and above and equivalents), senior officials in the Joint or Defense Intelligence Community, and members of the Senior Executive Service,” according to the latest IG semi-annual

report to Congress that is current as of March 31, 2017.

IG investigations under the Presidential Policy Directive-19 appear to be extremely rare.

From 2013 to 2017, only three case were confirmed under PPD-19 among the 239 cases the IG “substantiated” across all the military services and civilian Defense Department employees, according to the

IG’s semi-annual report.

expected to last no more than three hours. The IG office is formally attempting to determine if they need to intervene in the Baker case, according to a source with direct knowledge of the investigation. Fine’s

removed him from his NSC post. Lovinger now works at a Defense Department annex where he currently is doing clerical work.

false” and called Baker “partisan and highly vindictive” in an interview.

Baker has leveled four separate charges against Lovinger. The counts include an “unauthorized” trip to Israel, taking home unclassified academic papers to read, reading a classified document in an airplane,

and having “unauthorized” contacts with the Indian government.

Baker’s accusation that the trip to Israel was “unauthorized” particularly rankles Lovinger.

Prior to the trip, Lovinger said that he notified ONA of an expected personal trip to Israel to commemorate his oldest son’s Bar Mitzvah. The Lovinger family traveled with their close family friends, the

Wiesel’s, whose patriarch, Elisha, is the son of legendary Holocaust survivor and Nobel Laureate Eli Wiesel.

Lovinger said that they only did “tourist stuff” and did not meet with a single Israeli official.

Another charge is that Lovinger conducted “unauthorized” contacts with the Indian government.

Lovinger’s 2017 performance review includes a statement from Secretary Carter, commending him for his work with the Indian government. “Two days prior to departing for the NSC, on January 18, 2017,

As for taking home papers, Baker sent an email to all ONA staff Nov. 1, 2016, in which he said, “Team-…acknowledging our cluttered workspace: we all read widely and have to as part of the job — all

“He clearly was the target, for political reasons, of an effort to push him out of government,” Perle said of Lovinger. “And this was done consciously and deliberately. He’s a Trump loyalist, and it was

launched and sustained by an Obama holdover.”

“This cries out for an investigation of Baker,” Perle added. Kemp called the sidelining of Lovinger “a great loss.” “He is very much a creative thinker and he’s not constrained by sort of narrow lines that

affect so many people in government,” Kemp said.

“As I understand it, he questioned the actions of various organizations within the U.S. Government, particularly the Office of Net Assessment. And of course, these may not be always welcomed by one’s

superiors,” Kemp said. As for the use of outside contractors, Kemp said, “I’m aware they [ONA] did depend a lot on in the past on external contractors. It’s not necessarily a good thing.” “To get rid of

someone like that on what appeared to be questionable grounds is potentially problematic for the effectiveness of the U.S. intelligence organization,” Kemp added.

Robert Reilly, who served for 25 years in the national security field, including as a senior advisor to Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and as a White House special assistant to Reagan said, “I’m very familiar with

the use of investigations to politically destroy people.” “That they would yank a top security clearance on what seemed to be unsubstantial grounds is shocking,” Reilly said.

Reilly also said he didn’t think the punishment fit the crime for Lovinger, and that it appeared Lovinger committed insignificant security infractions. “There’s a disproportion here that immediately raises

dollars. He held numerous state and federal certifications and credentials to this effect and was certified as an investigator under the State Government at the California Office Of Consumer Affairs. He also

worked as a CEO, Inventor and Product Development Director for which the U.S. Government has awarded him dozens of seminal patent awards for products in use by Microsoft, Sony and other major

companies to provide products and services to billions of people. He has received a vast number of commendation letters from U.S. Presidents, Agency heads and Mayors. He is pictured in videos,

photographs, articles, meetings and personal correspondence with some of the most famous public and White House figures in America.

After he, and his team, reported corruption in a trillion dollar Department of Energy embezzlement scam involving crooked uranium (The Uranium One Scandal is now in the news headlines), lithium, indium

experience than him. He has now been forced to try to live on $800.00 per month because of the attacks by government officials.

in-court and no justice, yet, from those lawsuits. The law suits have simply highlighted the epic degree of stone-walling, “missing hard-drives” and obfuscation that Obama DOJ, DOE and DoD officials are

He and his supporters believe that he has been intentionally discriminated against as part of a reprisal. The federal courts and law enforcement have ruled in his ongoing cases, and hold proof, that he was

subjected to reprisal, vendetta and revenge tactics by State and Federal employees. Even though official proof of the attacks are on public record. Nothing has been done to help him.

In the Energy Department case, his task force helped FBI, GAO and Congress hunt down and terminate well-known public officials who embezzled taxpayer funds.

Even though he has been a productive, working member of his community and the U.S. Government and he has organized companies and programs which have paid millions of dollars in taxes to that

Government, he is only afforded the most minimal benefits possible and has received no offsets for the reprisal crimes committed against him.

His current benefits amount is so low it is impossible to live on. County officials have suggested he “move to Panama” where it is cheaper. Even Panama, and other third world countries, won’t let you live

there unless you are receiving at least $1000.00 to $1500.00 in benefits. You heard it right, Government officials are asking native-born Americans to leave the country. Did you think that the taxes you were

paying were to underwrite State and Federal agencies who are trying to send natural born citizen taxpayers to third-world countries and deplete the nation of its human resources. Is THAT the “American

Dream”?

terminating his operating, Congressionally financed, electric car company and his national energy company because they competed with Senator’s and Agency bosses business investments.

Part of his work involved creating America’s next national energy solutions. He worked with the U.S. Department of Energy, HUD, NAHB and related entities in work with the national weapons and energy

patents, industry and press acclaim, customer acclaim and a multi-million dollar lab research grant in the Congressional Iraq War Bill.

He was one of the people tasked with building America’s back-up energy technologies.

raid on their facilities and an ongoing FBI investigation. This also led to a suspected reprisal exposure to toxic materials which will remain in his body, at a cellular level, for the rest of his life. This also led to

black-listing and HR database manipulation attacks by attack firms such as Fusion GPS, Stratfor, In-Q-Tel, Gawker, David Brock Group, PD Group, Black Cube and related contract reprisal services featured

in contemporary news headlines. They were hired to poison him and his brand and “terminate” him and his career (in every sense of the word).

Because of their service to their country, Adam Lovinger, David, and many others, have been denied their legal rights, their rights to a home and safety and are forced to live like refugees. Their U.S.

Constitution and State Constitutional rights have been denied because they did the right thing and helped law enforcement.

public: That us a felony conflict of interest!

This is about vendettas and revenge. The U.S. Attorney General, The Head of the White House Press Office, The Director of the FBI, The Secretary of Energy and his staff have been fired, or forced to quit,

because of these cases. This is a very large matter but it is not about politics. It is about felony level crime and the physical, toxicological, emotional, reputational, brand and strategic attacks on the public by

Senior federal and state executive government officials, and their campaign financiers at Google and Tesla Motors, ordered, operated and paid for the disabling attacks described herein and those disabling

listing; character assassination and internet trolling and bot-attacks; benefits stone-walling, and worse.